Hubble Presentations
Overview and Analysis of HST Returned FEP Insulation
Tom Zuby, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
Kim de Groh, NASA Lewis Research Center
FEP Material Inventory
- Solar Array I Drive Arm Multi Layer Insulation (SA-I MLI)
- Magnetic Sensing System Electronic Box Multi Layer Insulation (MSS MLI)
Space Environment
- 3.6 years in orbit.
- Atomic Oxygen (AO) fluence in the ram direction estimated to be 7.59 x 10^20 atoms per centimeter squared.
- Solar Fluence
- SA-I drive arm material not yet calculated but thought to be similar to the MSS calculated values.
- MSS MLI solar fluence values calculated for the MSS MLI sample range from 0.51 to 1.90 sun years.
SA-I Drive Arm MLI
- Contamination
- Micrometeoroid or Debris
- Thickness
- Other Space Effects
SA-I Drive Arm MLI: Surface Contamination
- Contamination Aspects
- Areas of yellow to brownish residue.
- Water spots.
- X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy is to be performed on selected samples removed from this specimen.
SA-I Drive Arm MLI: Micrometeoroid or Debris
- 6 impact sites identified.
- Residue not yet identified as being man-made or naturally occurring.
- Shock ring size varies with regard to penetration hole size.
SA-I Drive Arm MLI: Other Space Effects
- Milky colored haziness.
- Predominant on the solar facing surfaces.
- Darkening of the stitching materials.
- Cracking of the FEP material.
MSS Electronics Box MLI
- Contamination
- Micrometeoroid or Debris
- Thickness
- Tensile and Elongation
- Other Space Effects
MSS MLI Surface: Contamination
- Very brown areas.
- Around cable holes.
- Along edges of Velcro.
- Darkening seems only to occur in proximity to underlying acrylic adhesive layer.
MSS MLI Surface: Micrometeoroid or Debris
- 3 impact sites identified
- Micro-photographs of these sites are still pending.
- Site 1: 6 layers penetrated
- Site 2: 4 layers penetrated
- Site 3: 8 layers penetrated
- Residue to be identified as man-made or naturally-occurring.
MSS MLI Surface: Other Space Effects
- Milky colored haziness.
- Cracking is evident on the material with high solar fluence.
- Adhesive failure is noted for the FEP/Acrylic interface.
- Increase of surface hardness.
Conclusions
- FEP MLI shows damage from space environmental exposure.
- Cracking occurrences increase with increased solar exposures.
- Increased hardness and reduced elongation was observed in areas of high solar fluence.
- Erosion yield appears to be greater for higher solar fluence surfaces and is an order of magnitude greater than LDEF values.
- FEP is still acceptable as a thermal blanket material provided:
- No insitu deformation occurs.
- A suitable backing is adhesively applied to the FEP layer to maintain structural integrity.
Further Study
- Determine accurate AO fluences for erosion yield calculations.
- Contamination evaluation.
- X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy.
- Scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive spectroscopy.
- Measure optical properties to determine changes in thermal control.
- Surface topography analysis with atomic force and scanning electron microscopy.
- Cross sectioned material analysis.
- Crack depth measurement
- Atomic force microscopy hardness as a function of distance from surface.
- Comparison of HST samples with both LDEF and ground-based samples.
Return to Hubble Space Telescope Hardware Archive System